How this was produced

This gap report was generated by the Knowledge Manager on 2026-05-13, analyzing the last 7 days of site activity (38 new/updated documents, 4 active authors, 0 comment threads). The snapshot shows a high-velocity period with significant work across three main areas: identity/vault UX design by @Untitled Contact, technical architecture and documentation by @Untitled Contact, and workflow/performance discussions by @Untitled Contact and @Untitled Contact. No comment activity was detected, meaning all knowledge production happened through document creation and editing rather than threaded discussion.

Open gaps

🔴 High priority

No synthesis of vault identity UX decisions

Evidence: Vault UX flows iterations, Sign-in clicking the avatar, Log in on a second device, Join a site with an existing identity

Why it matters: A single author produced 61 events across multiple identity UX documents this week, but no synthesis document captures the design decisions, trade-offs, or open questions for the team to review.

Proposed action: Create a synthesis document that distills the vault identity user stories into agreed patterns, unresolved tensions, and next design iterations.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

No documented architecture decision record for publish guard proposal

Evidence: Publish guard — block publishing when document content references local drafts

Why it matters: A new architectural constraint (blocking publish on local draft references) was proposed without an ADR or decision log entry, making it hard to trace why this was chosen over alternatives.

Proposed action: Convert the tech talk into a formal architecture decision record with context, options considered, and decision rationale.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

No resolution or synthesis for "deleted vs not found" issue

Evidence: Deleted vs not found

Why it matters: This issue was updated but remains unresolved, and the distinction between "deleted" and "not found" states has UX and data integrity implications that should be settled before further work.

Proposed action: Schedule a decision session or write a proposal document to resolve the state distinction and document the chosen approach.

Suggested owner: open

🟡 Medium priority

No cross-reference between desktop data flow and reactive architecture plan

Evidence: Desktop data flow, Reactive desktop architecture plan

Why it matters: Two documents describe related desktop architecture concerns but were authored by different people without linking to each other, risking duplicated or conflicting designs.

Proposed action: Add cross-references between the two documents and flag any contradictions for resolution.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

No documented performance baseline for e2e measurement

Evidence: E2E performance measurement, Measurement

Why it matters: Performance measurement work is underway but there is no published baseline or target thresholds, making it impossible to evaluate regressions or improvements.

Proposed action: Document current performance baselines and target thresholds in the measurement document.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

No synthesis of document command design solutions

Evidence: Document commands — design solutions, Simplify content insertion within documents

Why it matters: Multiple design solution documents exist under document commands but no overview captures the design direction, accepted patterns, or open questions.

Proposed action: Create a parent synthesis document for document command design solutions.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

🟢 Low priority / parking lot

No user test results published from recent tests

Evidence: User tests

Why it matters: A user tests document exists but no results or findings have been published, leaving the team without actionable insights.

Proposed action: Publish findings from the user tests or mark the document as placeholder.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

No feedback loop documented for knowledge agent server setup

Evidence: Feedback on knowledge agent server setup

Why it matters: Feedback was collected but no document captures whether the feedback was addressed or what changes resulted.

Proposed action: Close the loop by documenting what actions were taken in response to the feedback.

Suggested owner: @Untitled Contact

Contradictions detected

No contradictions detected this period. The four active authors worked in largely separate domains (identity UX, architecture, performance, workflows) with minimal overlap that would produce conflicting claims.

Stale or potentially outdated content

Workflows document — Workflows received 7 updates in a single day (2026-05-13) suggesting rapid iteration. The final state should be reviewed for consistency with the Shape up meeting notes from 2026-05-11.

Interface notions — Interface notions was last updated 2026-05-11 and may need alignment with the vault UX work that followed.

Patterns

High individual velocity, low cross-referencing: The most active author (@Untitled Contact, 61 events) worked almost exclusively on identity UX documents without linking to related architecture or workflow documents. This suggests a silo risk.

Tech talks as primary knowledge format: 10 of 38 documents are in the tech-talks namespace, indicating this is the preferred format for proposing ideas. However, none of these were converted into decision records or